Since beginning the DTS extended the SPI0 in two places adding two SPI muxes, each with same SPI NOR flash. Both used exactly the same chip-selects, so this was clearly buggy code. Without checking in datasheet, assume device has only one SPI NOR flash, so code was duplicated. Fixes dtc W=1 warnings: sparx5_pcb134_board.dtsi:277.10-281.4: Warning (unique_unit_address_if_enabled): /axi@600000000/spi@600104000/flash@0: duplicate unit-address (also used in node /axi@600000000/spi@600104000/spi@0) Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Not tested on hardware --- .../boot/dts/microchip/sparx5_pcb134_board.dtsi | 16 ---------------- 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/microchip/sparx5_pcb134_board.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/microchip/sparx5_pcb134_board.dtsi index f165a409bc1d..dc7b59dfcb40 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/microchip/sparx5_pcb134_board.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/microchip/sparx5_pcb134_board.dtsi @@ -281,22 +281,6 @@ flash@0 { }; }; -&spi0 { - status = "okay"; - spi@0 { - compatible = "spi-mux"; - mux-controls = <&mux>; - #address-cells = <1>; - #size-cells = <0>; - reg = <0>; /* CS0 */ - flash@9 { - compatible = "jedec,spi-nor"; - spi-max-frequency = <8000000>; - reg = <0x9>; /* SPI */ - }; - }; -}; - &sgpio0 { status = "okay"; microchip,sgpio-port-ranges = <8 15>; -- 2.34.1