On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 05:45:21AM -0700, Emil Renner Berthing wrote: > Jisheng Zhang wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 06:06:58PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > > > Yo, > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 07:13:48PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 09:26:00PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > > > > > The Milkv Mars is a development board based on the Starfive JH7110 SoC. > > > > > The board features: > > > > > > > > > > - JH7110 SoC > > > > > - 1/2/4/8 GiB LPDDR4 DRAM > > > > > - AXP15060 PMIC > > > > > - 40 pin GPIO header > > > > > - 3x USB 3.0 host port > > > > > - 1x USB 2.0 host port > > > > > - 1x M.2 E-Key > > > > > - 1x eMMC slot > > > > > - 1x MicroSD slot > > > > > - 1x QSPI Flash > > > > > - 1x 1Gbps Ethernet port > > > > > - 1x HDMI port > > > > > - 1x 2-lane DSI and 1x 4-lane DSI > > > > > - 1x 2-lane CSI > > > > > > > > > > Add the devicetree file describing the currently supported features, > > > > > namely PMIC, UART, I2C, GPIO, SD card, QSPI Flash, eMMC and Ethernet. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Got a dtbs_check issue in the patchwork CI: > > > > > > > > +arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-milkv-mars.dtb: gmac1-rgmii-rxin-clock: 'clock-frequency' is a required property > > > > + from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/fixed-clock.yaml# > > > > +arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-milkv-mars.dtb: gmac1-rmii-refin-clock: 'clock-frequency' is a required property > > > > + from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/fixed-clock.yaml# > > > > > > > > Can you fix that please? Also, I applied some patches the other day that > > > > seem to conflict quite a bit with the common board dts patch. Would you > > > > please do a rebase on top of that please? > > > > > > Been going through stuff on my todo list now that the merge window is > > > closed. Could you please resend this with the rebase done? > > > > Thanks for the reminding, I will rebase on 6.9-rc1 then send out the > > patches. > > Hi Jisheng, Hi, > > A rebase would be great. It looks good to me, but could you maybe call the > common .dtsi something more generic like jh7110-common.dtsi like the > jh7100-common.dtsi. If we'll see other boards based on the jh7110 upstreamed make sense, will do in v4 series. > (eg. Star64) I suspect they'll also be heavily based on^M^M^M similar to the > VF2 schematics. > > /Emil > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Conor. > > > >
