On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 06:24:49PM +1300, Simon Glass wrote: > Add two compatibles for binman entries, as a starting point for the > schema. > > Note that, after discussion on v2, we decided to keep the existing > meaning of label so as not to require changes to existing userspace > software when moving to use binman nodes to specify the firmware > layout. > > Note also that, after discussion on v6, we decided to use the same > 'fixed-partition' schema for the binman features, so this version > adds a new 'binman.yaml' file providing the new compatibles to the > existing partition.yaml binding. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > (no changes since v8) > > Changes in v8: > - Switch the patch ordering so the partition change comes first > > Changes in v7: > - Adjust MAINTAINERS entry > - Put compatible strings into the 'fixed-partition' binding > > Changes in v5: > - Add mention of why 'binman' is the vendor > - Drop 'select: false' > - Tidy up the compatible setings > - Use 'tfa-bl31' instead of 'atf-bl31' > > Changes in v4: > - Correct selection of multiple compatible strings > > Changes in v3: > - Drop fixed-partitions from the example > - Use compatible instead of label > > Changes in v2: > - Use plain partition@xxx for the node name > > .../bindings/mtd/partitions/binman.yaml | 49 +++++++++++++++++++ > .../bindings/mtd/partitions/partition.yaml | 21 ++++++++ > MAINTAINERS | 5 ++ > 3 files changed, 75 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/binman.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/binman.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/binman.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..83417ad5cee9 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/binman.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mtd/partitions/binman.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: Binman entries > + > +description: | > + TBD ? > + > +maintainers: > + - Simon Glass <sjg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > + > +allOf: > + - $ref: /schemas/mtd/partitions/partition.yaml# > + > +properties: > + compatible: > + enum: > + - binman,entry # generic binman entry As-is, 'binman' would need to be added to vendor-prefixes.yaml. However, I think just 'binman' would provide just as much information. But really, does it provide anything? What would be the difference between this and no compatible? Rob
