On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 09:24:54AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 20/03/2024 09:18, Johan Hovold wrote: > > Perhaps you should not comment before reading up on the history of this > > series. > > > > This was all intended for 6.9, but merging was stalled for a number of > > reasons so here we are. The patches were also going in through different > > trees, so patch 4/5 is the first Qualcomm SoC patch. > > Again, well, you sent it at few days before merge window, so how do you > imagine this being applied for v6.9 and still fulfilling "few linux-next > cycles before merge window" requirement? Especially that arm-soc cut off > is much earlier :/. I talk about patch 5, of course, because that is not > a fix (at least not marked as one). Don't expect in general a arms-co > patch to be applied four days before merge window, thus the actual fix - > patch #4 - should be split. At the time there was still hope that there may be an rc8, and the patch in question had been used by a large number of X13s users for several weeks, which is a lot more testing than the average Qualcomm patch receives, whether it's in linux-next or not. And patch 5 depends on the earlier patches in the series so it belongs in the series, which was also initially posted long before the merge window. I'm sure Bjorn A can handle this in general, even if he failed to notice the CC stable tag or had other reasons for applying the fix for 6.10 instead of 6.9. Johan
