On 14/03/2024 11:26, Sumit Garg wrote: > On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 at 15:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski > <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 14/03/2024 10:36, Sumit Garg wrote: >>>> >>>> But it then broke dtbs_check. >>> >>> See following breakage afterwards: >>> >>> $ make qcom/apq8016-schneider-hmibsc.dtb dtbs_check >>> <snip> >>> /home/sumit/build/upstream/linux/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8016-schneider-hmibsc.dtb: >>> leds: led@5: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('reg' was >>> unexpected) >>> from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/leds/leds-gpio.yaml# >>> /home/sumit/build/upstream/linux/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8016-schneider-hmibsc.dtb: >>> leds: led@6: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('reg' was >>> unexpected) >>> from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/leds/leds-gpio.yaml# >>> /home/sumit/build/upstream/linux/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8016-schneider-hmibsc.dtb: >>> leds: '#address-cells', '#size-cells' do not match any of the regexes: >>> '(^led-[0-9a-f]$|led)', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+' >> >> That's obvious, I don't get what is the question. Adding not correct >> properties is not a solution and dtbs_check correctly tells you that. >> >> If you only opened absolutely any existing upstream source, you would >> see how the gpio leds are represented in DTS. >> > > It looks like my reference example: > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8016-sbc.dts wasn't correct then. I will > drop unit addresses then. Oops, unlucky for you, that is one of old DTS which was not yet fixed. I am surprised that I missed it, I'll fix it now. Best regards, Krzysztof