On 3/12/2024 10:21 AM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > >> Basically, I would prefer better than "qcom, fw-managed" since this is not >> a qcom specific problem. > > > We already have something like this in mainline where the BAM DMA controller is remotely powered. > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml?h=v6.8 > As you can see it is already fragmented. Why we need to create one more approach which is not scalable and specific to SOC vendor? SCMI or RPMI based firmware is not a QC specific. I also have allergic reaction when I see drivers modified w/ if (fw_managed) {..} but that is a discussion for some other day. -- ---Trilok Soni