Re: [PATCH 0/4] Use reg instead of ti,bit-shift for clksel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [240302 19:18]:
> Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > If you had some good idea in mind for the #address-cells = <2> for the
> > remaining unconnected composite clocks maybe clarify it a bit.
> > 
> I was just wondering whether we could do reg = <register bit> then.

Yeah sure nothing stopping us from doing that too if it helps :)

Regards,

Tony




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux