Hello, On Fri Mar 8, 2024 at 12:01 AM CET, Andi Shyti wrote: > Hi Theo, > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 06:59:23PM +0100, Théo Lebrun wrote: > > IRQ_MASK and I2C_CLEAR_ALL_INTS both mask available interrupts. IRQ_MASK > > removes top options (bits 29-31). I2C_CLEAR_ALL_INTS removes reserved > > options including top bits. Keep the latter. > > > > 31 29 27 25 23 21 19 17 15 13 11 09 07 05 03 01 > > 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 08 06 04 02 00 > > --- IRQ_MASK: -------------------------------------------------- > > 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 > > 0 0 0 > > --- I2C_CLEAR_ALL_INTS: ---------------------------------------- > > 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 > > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > > > > Notice I2C_CLEAR_ALL_INTS is more restrictive than IRQ_MASK. > > > > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > You did answer my question in v2, thanks, Theo! Oops my mailer syntax is telling me that the lines starting with '---' might cause issue as it might mark the end of commit messages. I'll fix that in next revision. If it gets applied before that it should be checked that part of the message doesn't get lost. Thanks Andi, -- Théo Lebrun, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
