On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 11:47:21AM +0100, Marco Felsch wrote:
> Drivers like the tcpm.c do search for a remote endpoint on different
> places to be dt-bindings compatible. The search is done on the device
> itself or on the child fwnode in case it was not found the first time.
>
> This indicates that not finding the remote endpoint at the first try is
> a valid use-case and should not cause an error printing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Hi,
>
> I'm not 100% certain if this is the correct place but if our platform
> follows the dt-bindings we receive
>
> | OF: graph: no port node found in /soc@0/bus@30800000/i2c@30a30000/tcpc@50
>
> a few times because of the below pr_err() and EPROBE_DEFER.
>
> Regards,
> Marco
>
> drivers/of/property.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> index 641a40cf5cf3..155df04a9512 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
> @@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_endpoint(const struct device_node *parent,
> of_node_put(node);
>
> if (!port) {
> - pr_err("graph: no port node found in %pOF\n", parent);
> + pr_notice("graph: no port node found in %pOF\n", parent);
Already changed to pr_debug.
Rob
