On 23.02.2024 19:26, Varshini Rajendran wrote: > Remove microchip,sam9x60-spi compatible from the list as the driver used > has the compatible atmel,at91rm9200-spi and sam9x60 devices also use the > same compatible as fallback. So removing the microchip,sam9x60-spi > compatible from the list since it is not needed. > I find this wrong. I though we shall add compatibles for each SoC. Are the registers and fields the same for the SPI IPs in these 2 SoCs? Even if they are the same, are you sure the IPs are integrated in the same way? > Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Changes in v4: > - Elaborated the explanation in the commit message to justify the patch > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/atmel,at91rm9200-spi.yaml | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/atmel,at91rm9200-spi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/atmel,at91rm9200-spi.yaml > index 58367587bfbc..32e7c14033c2 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/atmel,at91rm9200-spi.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/atmel,at91rm9200-spi.yaml > @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ properties: > - const: atmel,at91rm9200-spi > - items: > - const: microchip,sam9x7-spi > - - const: microchip,sam9x60-spi > - const: atmel,at91rm9200-spi > > reg:
