On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 01:32:09PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > On 01/20/2015 07:52 AM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > > > > > > On 01/09/2015 02:54 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > >> A new round for the IMG PWM driver. > >> > >> The IMG PWM controller is muxed with a PDM controller, through a shared > >> so-called periph register bit, which sets the output as PWM or PDM. > >> Because this register is not part of the pin controller block, but rather > >> PWM/PDM specific, and because the register is also used to set the PDM value, > >> it is simpler to use a regmap-based syscon to deal with it. > >> > >> This time, I'm removing the PDM driver from the submission and submitting the PWM > >> alone. The PDM was written as a misc driver, but had some design issues, so for > >> now I'm proposing to merge the PWM only. > >> > >> The series is based on v3.19-rc3. If at all possible I'd like to see this merged > >> for v3.20. > >> > > > > Thierry, > > > > Any comments on this? Any chance we merge it in time for v3.20? > > It's -rc5 already and I've started to worry. > > > > Thierry, > > I'm very sorry to be so bothering, but I got no news from you and it's > -rc6 already. I'd say I'll resend this series to Andrew Morton, hoping > we can merge this for v3.20. > > Please let me know if you'll be able to pick this. I can pick it up if you make up your mind about the license. The header comment says GPL v2 or later, but MODULE_LICENSE has "GPL v2", which does not include the "or later" part. Also you're making it especially difficult to build-test by not providing even the basic bits of your SoC support first. All even linux-next seems to have for the Pistachio SoC is the addition of a compatible string to the dw-mmc driver. I'll take the PWM driver, but I'll assume that you'll eventually have more pieces available, in which case I'd appreciate a note so I can update my build scripts. Thierry
Attachment:
pgpZTcTAU5tfP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
