Re: [PATCH RFC v3 1/5] dt-bindings: phy: hisi-inno-usb2: convert to YAML

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/20/2024 5:37 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 19/02/2024 22:35, Yang Xiwen wrote:
On 2/20/2024 5:32 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 19/02/2024 22:27, Yang Xiwen via B4 Relay wrote:
From: Yang Xiwen <forbidden405@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Add missing compatible "hisilicon,hi3798mv100-usb2-phy" to compatible
list due to prior driver change.

Also rename to hisilicon,inno-usb2-phy.yaml and add this name to
compatible lists.

Fixes: 3940ffc65492 ("phy: hisilicon: Add inno-usb2-phy driver for Hi3798MV100")
Signed-off-by: Yang Xiwen <forbidden405@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
   .../bindings/phy/hisilicon,inno-usb2-phy.yaml      | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++
   .../devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-hisi-inno-usb2.txt | 71 ----------------
   2 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/hisilicon,inno-usb2-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/hisilicon,inno-usb2-phy.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1b57e0396209
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/hisilicon,inno-usb2-phy.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/hisilicon,inno-usb2-phy.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: HiSilicon HiSTB SoCs INNO USB2 PHY device
+
+maintainers:
+  - Yang Xiwen <forbidden405@xxxxxxxxxxx>
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    items:
+      - enum:
+          - hisilicon,hi3798cv200-usb2-phy
+          - hisilicon,hi3798mv100-usb2-phy
+      - const: hisilicon,inno-usb2-phy
According to your driver hisilicon,hi3798mv100-usb2-phy and
hisilicon,inno-usb2-phy are not compatible.
Ah, i didn't pay too much attention to that. I should remove the entry
for hisilicon,inno-usb2-phy in the driver. Sorry for that.
We don't talk here about driver, although I used the driver as proof or
argument, because I don't have access to hardware datasheet (and no
intention to look there).

What I claim is these are not compatible, so respond to this argument,
not some other one.

Why not? Of course they are compatible. All 3 SoCs are using inno-usb2-phy. The only difference here is the method to access the registers. They are all enabled by `writing BIT(2) to address 0x6`. In the cover letter, I said the driver is actually doing things wrong. Especially the commit adding PHY_TYPE enums, the name is confusing and conveys the wrong info. It's not PHY which are not compatible, it's the bus. I'll fix the driver, but still the PHY hardwares are compatible between these 3 SoCs.

I'll say the driver is broken from the beginning. They should move write_reg function to a separate regmap driver and only left `write BIT(2) to addr 0x6` to the PHY driver.


Best regards,
Krzysztof


--
Regards,
Yang Xiwen





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux