On 01/29/2015 11:05 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 10:49:34AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote: >> Hi Varka, >> >> On 01/29/2015 10:26 AM, Varka Bhadram wrote: >>> This check is not required. It will be done by devm_ioremap_resource() >> >> I disagree. devm_ioremap_resource() interprets the NULL resource as >> a bad parameter and returns -EINVAL which is then forwarded as the >> return value from the probe. >> >> -ENODEV is the correct return value from the probe if the expected >> resource is not available (either because it doesn't exist or was already >> claimed by another driver). > > (Adding Thierry as the author of this function.) > > I believe devm_ioremap_resource() was explicitly designed to remove such > error handling from drivers, and to give drivers a unified error response > to such things as missing resources. > > See the comments for this function in lib/devres.c. Maybe the purpose would be better served by wrapping the idiom in a single function. Regards, Peter Hurley -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
