Re: [RFC V2] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 07:09:23AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 29 January 2015 at 01:36, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >> +  Required properties:
> >> +  - compatible: allow OPPs to express their compatibility.
> >> +  - opp-list: phandle to opp-list defined above.

> > I don't understand what that compatible property is intended to mean and
> > I expect other readers might be similarly confused - is it a standard
> > compatbile property meaning this noe corresponds to some sort of device?

> The goal is to choose the driver which we want to probe for a platform. There
> can be multiple DT enabled cpufreq drivers present in a build and the platform
> needs some way to choose one of them.

So you need to document this as a platform device then if that's what
you're doing here; there's more than just specifying a compatible string
involved.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux