On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 22:57:11 +0200 Cristian Ciocaltea wrote: > > First off, have another read of our rules: > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#tl-dr > > :) > > Oh, net/net-next suffix is required, will make sure to add it next time! > > The 24h period restriction is still applicable for a RESEND that is > meant to quickly fix a previous submission issue? Yes, reposting too quickly often leads to reviewers looking at the wrong version. > > IMHO forwarding the review tag to a newer version of the set yourself > > (like I just did) is fine. None of the tooling I know checks if that > > the person posting the tag matches the From: > > Hmm, I didn't actually test, but according to the link Andrew posted > above, for b4 it might be necessary to make use of the > `--sloppy-trailers` flag: > > "Accept trailers where the email address of the sender differs from the > email address found in the trailer itself." Hah, interesting. Using a corporate address for the tag but ML-friendly account for sending the email is quite common. I'm surprised. In any case, our tools don't do this. I think it's kinda pointless unless the tool can also prove provenance of the tags already in the patch...
