On 01/26/2015 09:19 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: > Hi Michal, > > Am 03.12.2014 um 09:39 schrieb Michal Simek: >> On 12/02/2014 05:07 PM, Soren Brinkmann wrote: >>> Add USB nodes to zc702, zc706 and zed device trees. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> v3: >>> - rename phy nodes: usb_phy -> phy0 >>> - rebased onto zynq/dt >>> v2: >>> - remove '@0' from phy node name >>> - don't add bogus space >>> --- >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc702.dts | 11 +++++++++++ >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc706.dts | 10 ++++++++++ >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zed.dts | 10 ++++++++++ >>> 4 files changed, 51 insertions(+) > [...] >> >> Applied to zynq/dt. > > Hm, I don't see this patch in linux-next next-20150123... > > And if I apply it to my -next based tree, adding corresponding nodes to > zynq-parallella.dts, I get repeatedly: > > [ +0,012242] ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.0: no of_node; not parsing pinctrl DT > [ +0,000157] ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.0: ChipIdea HDRC found, lpm: 0; cap: > f090e100 op: f090e140 > [ +0,000081] platform ci_hdrc.0: Driver ci_hdrc requests probe deferral > [ +0,005360] ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.1: no of_node; not parsing pinctrl DT > [ +0,000120] ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.1: ChipIdea HDRC found, lpm: 0; cap: > f0910100 op: f0910140 > [ +0,001810] platform ci_hdrc.1: Driver ci_hdrc requests probe deferral > > Am I missing any other patches or config options? > (I do notice that the pinctrl v3 patch that got merged has a trivial bug > for usb0, for which I'll send a patch later on.) Why is it deferred? Is it because of pinmuxing stuff? Thanks, Michal -- Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91 w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854 Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/ Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
