Hi Michal, Am 03.12.2014 um 09:39 schrieb Michal Simek: > On 12/02/2014 05:07 PM, Soren Brinkmann wrote: >> Add USB nodes to zc702, zc706 and zed device trees. >> >> Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> v3: >> - rename phy nodes: usb_phy -> phy0 >> - rebased onto zynq/dt >> v2: >> - remove '@0' from phy node name >> - don't add bogus space >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ >> arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc702.dts | 11 +++++++++++ >> arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc706.dts | 10 ++++++++++ >> arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zed.dts | 10 ++++++++++ >> 4 files changed, 51 insertions(+) [...] > > Applied to zynq/dt. Hm, I don't see this patch in linux-next next-20150123... And if I apply it to my -next based tree, adding corresponding nodes to zynq-parallella.dts, I get repeatedly: [ +0,012242] ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.0: no of_node; not parsing pinctrl DT [ +0,000157] ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.0: ChipIdea HDRC found, lpm: 0; cap: f090e100 op: f090e140 [ +0,000081] platform ci_hdrc.0: Driver ci_hdrc requests probe deferral [ +0,005360] ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.1: no of_node; not parsing pinctrl DT [ +0,000120] ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.1: ChipIdea HDRC found, lpm: 0; cap: f0910100 op: f0910140 [ +0,001810] platform ci_hdrc.1: Driver ci_hdrc requests probe deferral Am I missing any other patches or config options? (I do notice that the pinctrl v3 patch that got merged has a trivial bug for usb0, for which I'll send a patch later on.) Regards, Andreas -- SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
