On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 1:32 AM Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Subject: Re: [PATCH NOT APPLY v3 6/6] pinctrl: scmi: implement > > On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 11:18 AM Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > > > -obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SCMI) += pinctrl-scmi.o > > > +obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SCMI) += pinctrl-scmi.o pinctrl-scmi-imx.o > > > > I think you should probably create a sub-Kconfig option for this file. > > Yeah, good suggestion. > > But as of now, the major issue is Cristian is not happy with adding > a vendor compatible for scmi pinctrl when vendor has its own pinconf map. > So we are stuck on how to support i.MX95 SCMI pinctrl. I see. > Previously Cristian suggested build exclusive for generic scmi pinctrl and > i.MX scmi pinctrl, but this means arm64 generic defconfig will not able > to include both configs. > > Do you have any suggestions? This is not a technical problem, I think it is more of a policy problem and I can just say what works with pinctrl, the others know better than me what is best for SCMI in general and how SCMI drivers should be designed. Yours, Linus Walleij
