Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 2/8] irqchip: Supply new driver for STi based devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Fri, 23 Jan 2015, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jan 2015, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > The only technical comment I have is: shouldn't all the stuff except
> > the resume function be marked __init or is any of this required post
> > init?
> 
> It's not common to mark functions invoked at and affter *_probe() as
> __init.  At least, not as far as I'm aware.

Right, if the probe stuff is supposed to be functional post init, then
we of course need to keep it around. But I guess we have no mechanism
to distinguish the 'boot only' and 'keep post init' case. Might be
worthwhile to investigate.

Thanks,

	tglx


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux