On 23/01/2024 14:59, Peng Fan wrote: >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: clock: support NXP i.MX95 >> >> On 23/01/2024 14:08, Peng Fan wrote: >>> Hi Conor, Krzysztof >>> >>> I replied you both here. >>> >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: clock: support NXP i.MX95 >>>> >>>> On 21/01/2024 12:46, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote: >>>>> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> Add i.MX95 clock dt-binding header file >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> This should be squashed with respective binding patch. >>> >>> i.MX95 use SCMI firmware, the SCP processor handles >>> clock/power/pinmux/reset/performance and etc. >>> >>> I just add the index that SCMI exports, and Linux/UBoot will use the >>> index and go through SCMI to do real HW configuration. >>> >>> In such case, should I still add HW information in a yaml binding doc? >>> I am not sure what should be added if yes. >> >> Then why do you need it in the binding? I don't see any use of this. > > ok, should I just add the clk index header in same folder as soc dtsi? I don't know yet. How are these being used, except SCMI firmware? Best regards, Krzysztof
