> Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: clock: support NXP i.MX95 > > On 23/01/2024 14:08, Peng Fan wrote: > > Hi Conor, Krzysztof > > > > I replied you both here. > > > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: clock: support NXP i.MX95 > >> > >> On 21/01/2024 12:46, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote: > >>> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> > >>> > >>> Add i.MX95 clock dt-binding header file > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> > >> > >> This should be squashed with respective binding patch. > > > > i.MX95 use SCMI firmware, the SCP processor handles > > clock/power/pinmux/reset/performance and etc. > > > > I just add the index that SCMI exports, and Linux/UBoot will use the > > index and go through SCMI to do real HW configuration. > > > > In such case, should I still add HW information in a yaml binding doc? > > I am not sure what should be added if yes. > > Then why do you need it in the binding? I don't see any use of this. ok, should I just add the clk index header in same folder as soc dtsi? Thanks, Peng. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
