Re: [RFC V2] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 23 January 2015 at 17:22, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:39:14PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:

> I tend to agree that this is clearer.  It might be nice to have variants
> for specifying directly as a percentage but I don't think it's really
> worth the complexity.

> If we change the binding to be typ/min/max rather than min/typ/max then
> we could also do this by allowing either one or three values to be
> specified.  That might be more worth the complexity especially given...

+1

>> > +  - voltage-tolerance: Specify the CPU voltage tolerance in percentage.
>
>> Please let's drop this.
>
> DT bindings are supposed to be stable, this means the code should accept
> old bindings and they should be documented as deprecated.

Yes, I have marked the earlier OPP bindings as deprecated. Will mark
this one too separately.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux