On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 10:41:04AM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> This IP has only one interrupt, hence interrupt-names is not necessary
> to have.
> Since there is no user yet, simply remove interrupt-names.
I'm a bit confused chief. Patch 2 in this series removes a user of this
property from a driver, so can you explain how this statement is true?
Maybe I need to drink a few cans of Monster and revisit this patchset?
Thanks,
Conor.
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/usb/mediatek,mt6360-tcpc.yaml | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/mediatek,mt6360-tcpc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/mediatek,mt6360-tcpc.yaml
> index 053264e60583..339bc9c00ac0 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/mediatek,mt6360-tcpc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/mediatek,mt6360-tcpc.yaml
> @@ -22,10 +22,6 @@ properties:
> interrupts:
> maxItems: 1
>
> - interrupt-names:
> - items:
> - - const: PD_IRQB
> -
> connector:
> type: object
> $ref: ../connector/usb-connector.yaml#
> @@ -58,7 +54,6 @@ examples:
> tcpc {
> compatible = "mediatek,mt6360-tcpc";
> interrupts-extended = <&gpio26 3 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
> - interrupt-names = "PD_IRQB";
>
> connector {
> compatible = "usb-c-connector";
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
