On 15.01.24 19:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15/01/2024 17:24, Javier Carrasco wrote:
>> Do you mean that the XVF3500 should not be represented as a platform
>> device and instead it should turn into an USB device represented as a
>> node of an USB controller? Something like this (Rockchip SoC):
>>
>> &usb_host1_xhci {
>> ...
>>
>> xvf3500 {
>> ...
>> };
>> };
>>
>> Did I get you right or is that not the correct representation? Thank you
>> again.
>
> I believe it should be just like onboard hub. I don't understand why
> onboard hub was limited to hub, because other USB devices also could be
> designed similarly by hardware folks :/
>
> And if we talk about Linux drivers, then your current solution does not
> support suspend/resume and device unbind.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Actually this series is an attempt to get rid of a misuse of the
onboard_usb_hub driver by a device that is not a HUB, but requires the
platform-part of that driver for the initialization.
What would be the best approach to provide support upstream? Should I
turn this driver into a generic USB driver that does what the
platform-part of the onboard HUB does? Or are we willing to accept
non-HUB devices in the onboard_usb_hub driver even though it supports
more operations?
I am adding linux-usb to this thread in case someone has other suggestions.
Thanks and best regards,
Javier Carrasco
