On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 06:18:12AM +0000, Leo Yan wrote:
[...]
> How about unify the power states passing for cpu idle and suspend?
>
> below is a example for dts which place all power state into psci
> entry, so that idle-states and system suspend both can reference
> the power state.
>
> psci {
> compatible = "arm,psci-0.2";
> method = "smc";
>
> power_state {
> CPU_POWER_OFF: cpu_power_off {
> state = <0x00010000>;
> };
>
> CLUSTER_POWER_OFF: cluster_power_off {
> state = <0x01010000>;
> };
>
> SOC_SUSPEND: soc_suspend {
> state = <0x01010001>;
> };
> };
> };
I do not see why this would help. We would end up with phandles to
the nodes above to get the parameter from idle-states, to me it
looks like churn honestly, I do not see where the improvement is.
Lorenzo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
