Hi Bjorn Helgaas,
On 12 January 2015 at 19:43, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:34:44AM +0100, Gabriel FERNANDEZ wrote:
>> sti pcie is built around a Synopsis Designware PCIe IP.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@xxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/host/Kconfig | 5 +
>> drivers/pci/host/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/pci/host/pci-st.c | 713 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Hi Gabriel,
>
> Can you add a MAINTAINERS update so I know who should ack changes to this
> driver?
yes no problem
>
>> 3 files changed, 719 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/pci/host/pci-st.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
>> index c4b6568..999d2b9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
>> @@ -102,4 +102,9 @@ config PCI_LAYERSCAPE
>> help
>> Say Y here if you want PCIe controller support on Layerscape SoCs.
>>
>> +config PCI_ST
>> + bool "ST STiH41x PCIe controller"
>> + depends on ARCH_STI
>> + select PCIE_DW
>
> Please add help text here.
>
okay
>> +static int st_pcie_rd_other_conf(struct pcie_port *pp, struct pci_bus *bus,
>> + unsigned int devfn, int where, int size,
>> + u32 *val)
>> +{
>> + u32 data;
>> + u32 bdf;
>> + struct st_pcie *pcie = to_st_pcie(pp);
>> + int is_root_bus = pci_is_root_bus(bus);
>> + int retry_count = 0;
>> + int ret;
>> + void __iomem *addr;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Prerequisite
>> + * PCI express devices will respond to all config type 0 cycles, since
>> + * they are point to point links. Thus to avoid probing for multiple
>> + * devices on the root, dw-pcie already check for us if it is on the
>> + * root bus / other slots. Also, dw-pcie checks for the link being up
>> + * as we will hang if we issue a config request and the link is down.
>> + * A switch will reject requests for slots it knows do not exist.
>> + */
>> + bdf = bdf_num(bus->number, devfn, is_root_bus);
>> + addr = pcie->config_area + config_addr(where,
>> + bus->parent->number == pp->root_bus_nr);
>> +retry:
>> + /* Set the config packet devfn */
>> + writel_relaxed(bdf, pp->dbi_base + FUNC0_BDF_NUM);
>> + readl_relaxed(pp->dbi_base + FUNC0_BDF_NUM);
>> +
>> + ret = dw_pcie_cfg_read(addr, where, size, &data);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * This is intended to help with when we are probing the bus. The
>> + * problem is that the wrapper logic doesn't have any way to
>> + * interrogate if the configuration request failed or not.
>> + * On the ARM we actually get a real bus error.
>> + *
>> + * Unfortunately this means it is impossible to tell the difference
>> + * between when a device doesn't exist (the switch will return a UR
>> + * completion) or the device does exist but isn't yet ready to accept
>> + * configuration requests (the device will return a CRS completion)
>
> We do have CRS support in the Linux PCI core, so I guess this comment means
> that the ST host bridge doesn't handle CRS correctly?
>
yes, it is.
>> + *
>> + * The result of this is that we will miss devices when probing.
>> + *
>> + * So if we are trying to read the dev/vendor id on devfn 0 and we
>> + * appear to get zero back, then we retry the request. We know that
>> + * zero can never be a valid device/vendor id. The specification says
>> + * we must retry for up to a second before we decide the device is
>> + * dead. If we are still dead then we assume there is nothing there and
>> + * return ~0
>> + *
>> + * The downside of this is that we incur a delay of 1s for every pci
>> + * express link that doesn't have a device connected.
>
> That sounds pretty bad and I assume is a consequence of CRS handling being
> broken in hardware.
>
>> + */
>> + if (((where & ~3) == 0) && devfn == 0 && (data == 0 || data == ~0)) {
>> + if (retry_count++ < 1000) {
>> + mdelay(1);
>> + goto retry;
>> + } else {
>> + *val = ~0;
>> + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + *val = data;
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPLv2");
>
> See license_is_gpl_compatible(). This string needs to be "GPL v2", not
> "GPLv2" to avoid tainting the kernel.
>
okay
> Bjorn
Thanks for reviewing
BR
Gabriel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
