Re: [PATCH 3/3] MAINTAINERS: add maintainer for pinctrl-at91

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
<plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Jan 19, 2015, at 6:29 PM, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Le 19/01/2015 11:02, Linus Walleij a écrit :
>>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Ludovic Desroches
>>> <ludovic.desroches@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> The more maintainers the better.
>>> Nicolas & J-C: can you ACK this?
>>
>> Absolutely:
>> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> I still maintain it does not see the need for 2 maintainers for a simple drivers
>
> Nack for me

Cool, as subsystem maintainer had some delays in getting
reviews on patches for the AT91 drivers sometimes, but if you're
gonna be as quick in response as on this patch set then I can live
without a comaintainer I guess.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux