On 27/12/2023 08:07, Ding, Shenghao wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Friday, December 22, 2023 1:31 AM >> To: Ding, Shenghao <shenghao-ding@xxxxxx>; broonie@xxxxxxxxxx; >> conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx >> Cc: robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Lu, Kevin >> <kevin-lu@xxxxxx>; Xu, Baojun <baojun.xu@xxxxxx>; >> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; lgirdwood@xxxxxxxxx; perex@xxxxxxxx; pierre- >> louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 13916275206@xxxxxxx; linux- >> sound@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >> liam.r.girdwood@xxxxxxxxx; soyer@xxxxxx; tiwai@xxxxxxx; Gupta, Peeyush >> <peeyush@xxxxxx>; Navada Kanyana, Mukund <navada@xxxxxx> >> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] ASoC: dt-bindings: remove tas2563 >> from yaml >> >> On 21/12/2023 11:13, Shenghao Ding wrote: >>> Remove tas2563 from tas2562, it will be supported in tas2781 to better >>> support dsp mode. >> >> Please provide rationale in terms of bindings and hardware, not in terms of >> driver. Or at least not only. For example "supported in tas2781" does not fit >> hardware part, so you sure must be talking about drivers thus why driver >> change would affect bindings? > This patch mainly change the binding, not the driver code. Tas2563 is unbound > to tas2562 driver, and bound to tas2781 driver. Then why do you reference driver "tas2781" here? Best regards, Krzysztof
