On Tue, 20 Jan 2015, Sascha Hauer wrote: > Hi Lee, > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 02:43:09PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Dec 2014, Flora Fu wrote: > > > > > Add core files for MT6397 MFD driver. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Flora Fu <flora.fu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 10 + > > > drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 + > > > drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c | 94 +++++++++ > > > include/linux/mfd/mt6397/core.h | 23 +++ > > > include/linux/mfd/mt6397/registers.h | 362 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 5 files changed, 490 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c > > > create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/mt6397/core.h > > > create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/mt6397/registers.h > > > > Looks okay. > > > > I assume there are dependancies on this patch. What are they? > > > > How would you like this set to be handled? > > This patch is outdated, I sent an updated series today (you are on Cc). Okay, thanks. > There are no compile time dependencies to the PMIC wrapper, but without > it the mfd part is pretty useless. I prefer to keep the series together > and merge it through arm-soc, but I would be fine with merging it > through mfd aswell. Yes, everyone feels the same about their cross-subsystem patch-sets. ;) If there are build-time dependencies I am always happy to take sets in via MFD and send out pull-requests to other subsystem Maintainers; however, if there are only run-time dependencies I prefer to save everyone the hassle and have them go in via their own subsystems. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
