> >>> I personally would like to see it accepted but it seems there are > >>> objections to this approach. I've yet to come up with anything better to > >>> offer as an alternative. > >> > >> I see. Thanks for the heads up! > > > > I'm also inclined to have this merged. A real fix might take > > time. > > NAK > > If you intend to merge it, then please carry: No worries. If this is "abusing" DT, then it is not going to be merged by me. I am sorry for Chris, but sometimes simple problems create quite some fuzz because Linux hardware abstractions has not foreseen certain use cases. Or the APIs dealing with them didn't forsee that. We have been there a lot of times :/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
