On 12/17/23 23:03, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 11:38:53AM -0800, Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
>> Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>>> Add pinmux configuration for DWMAC found on the JH7100 based boards and
>>> enable the related DT node, providing a basic PHY configuration.
>>>
>>> Co-developed-by: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> .../boot/dts/starfive/jh7100-common.dtsi | 85 +++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7100-common.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7100-common.dtsi
>>> index 42fb61c36068..5cafe8f5c2e7 100644
>>> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7100-common.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7100-common.dtsi
>>> @@ -72,7 +72,92 @@ wifi_pwrseq: wifi-pwrseq {
>>> };
>>> };
>>>
>>> +&gmac {
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&gmac_pins>;
>>> + phy-mode = "rgmii-id";
>>> + phy-handle = <&phy>;
>>
>> I'm not sure if it's a generic policy or not, but I don't really like adding a
>> reference to a non-existant node here. I'd move this property to the board
>> files where the phy node is actually defined.
>
> FWIW, I don't like the reference-in-the-wrong-place thing either.
Yeah, as I already mentioned this was unintentional, will fix in v4.
Thanks,
Cristian
