On 14/12/2023 11:52, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> The gs101 clock names are derived from the clock register names under
> some certain rules. In particular, for the gate clocks the following is
> documented and expected in the gs101 clock driver:
>
> Replace CLK_CON_GAT_CLKCMU with CLK_GOUT_CMU and gout_cmu
> Replace CLK_CON_GAT_GATE_CLKCMU with CLK_GOUT_CMU and gout_cmu
>
> For gates remove _UID _BLK _IPCLKPORT and _RSTNSYNC
I don't understand what it has to do with the bindings.
>
> The CMU TOP gate clock names missed to include the required "CMU"
> differentiator which will cause name collisions with the gate clock names
> of other clock units. Fix the TOP gate clock names and include "CMU" in
> their name.
Neither here. Clock names are not related to defines.
>
> Fixes: 0a910f160638 ("dt-bindings: clock: Add Google gs101 clock management unit bindings")
> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-gs101.c | 167 ++++++++++++-----------
> include/dt-bindings/clock/google,gs101.h | 144 +++++++++----------
I miss the point why bindings must be changed with driver.
Really, guys, we are milling the first GS101 patches for entire cycle.
Almost 3 months. The moment I merge bindings you tell me they are wrong.
Few days after merging them.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
