Hi Conor Dooley,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2023 4:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 8/8] dt-bindings: mfd: dlg,da9063: Convert da9062
> to json-schema
>
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 06:51:14PM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> > Hi Conor Dooley,
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 6:38 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 8/8] dt-bindings: mfd: dlg,da9063: Convert
> > > da9062 to json-schema
> > >
> > > On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 01:47:17PM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> > > > Convert the da9062 PMIC device tree binding documentation to json-
> > > schema.
> > > >
> > > > Document the missing gpio child node for da9062.
> > > >
> > > > While at it, update description with link to product information
> > > > and example.
> > > >
> > > > The missing child node with of_compatible defined in MFD_CELL_OF
> > > > is causing the below warning message:
> > > > da9062-gpio: Failed to locate of_node [id: -1]
> > > >
> > > > So, make all child nodes with of_compatible defined in struct
> > > > mfd_cell as required property for da906{1,2} devices.
> > >
> > > > + gpio-controller: true
> > > > +
> > > > + "#gpio-cells":
> > > > + const: 2
> > > > +
> > > > + gpio:
> > > > + type: object
> > > > + additionalProperties: false
> > > > + properties:
> > > > + compatible:
> > > > + const: dlg,da9062-gpio
> > >
> > > > + - |
> > > > + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> > > > + #include <dt-bindings/regulator/dlg,da9063-regulator.h>
> > > > + i2c {
> > > > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > > > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > > > + pmic@58 {
> > > > + compatible = "dlg,da9062";
> > > > + reg = <0x58>;
> > > > + gpio-controller;
> > > > + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> > >
> > > > + gpio {
> > > > + compatible = "dlg,da9062-gpio";
> > > > + };
> > >
> > > I know you had some conversation with Krzysztof, but I still don;t
> > > really follow this. Why is the parent, rather than the child, the
> > > one that gets the "gpio-controller" and "#gpio-cells" properties?
> > > The commit message just mentions why missing child node was added,
> > > but not the reason for the gpio properties being added at what appears
> to be the "wrong" level.
> >
> >
> > Please see [1], The driver is checking against parent "gpio-controller"
> >
> > [1]
> > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.0-rc4/source/drivers/pinctrl/pinct
> > rl-da9062.c#L270
>
> I would appreciate if you could note in your commit message the rationale
> behind the strange setup. Citing the existing driver users etc would be
> helpful.
OK, I don't add this because the existing binding add this property in parent
and driver is based on this documentation.
There is no harm in adding this info in commit message as we are converting .txt into .yaml.
Cheers,
Biju
