Hi Conor Dooley,
Thanks for the feedback.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 6:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 8/8] dt-bindings: mfd: dlg,da9063: Convert da9062
> to json-schema
>
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 01:47:17PM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> > Convert the da9062 PMIC device tree binding documentation to json-
> schema.
> >
> > Document the missing gpio child node for da9062.
> >
> > While at it, update description with link to product information and
> > example.
> >
> > The missing child node with of_compatible defined in MFD_CELL_OF is
> > causing the below warning message:
> > da9062-gpio: Failed to locate of_node [id: -1]
> >
> > So, make all child nodes with of_compatible defined in struct mfd_cell
> > as required property for da906{1,2} devices.
>
> > + gpio-controller: true
> > +
> > + "#gpio-cells":
> > + const: 2
> > +
> > + gpio:
> > + type: object
> > + additionalProperties: false
> > + properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + const: dlg,da9062-gpio
>
> > + - |
> > + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> > + #include <dt-bindings/regulator/dlg,da9063-regulator.h>
> > + i2c {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + pmic@58 {
> > + compatible = "dlg,da9062";
> > + reg = <0x58>;
> > + gpio-controller;
> > + #gpio-cells = <2>;
>
> > + gpio {
> > + compatible = "dlg,da9062-gpio";
> > + };
>
> I know you had some conversation with Krzysztof, but I still don;t really
> follow this. Why is the parent, rather than the child, the one that gets
> the "gpio-controller" and "#gpio-cells" properties? The commit message
> just mentions why missing child node was added, but not the reason for the
> gpio properties being added at what appears to be the "wrong" level.
Please see [1], The driver is checking against parent "gpio-controller"
[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.0-rc4/source/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-da9062.c#L270
Cheers,
Biju
