On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 10:51:09AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 06:40:09PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > > > OK. How about, "qcom,broken-refclk"? This reflects the fact that the default > > refclk operation is broken on this platform, so the OS should be prepared for > > it (by keeping it always on). > > Shouldn't that be > > qcom,broken-clkreq > > since its the CLKREQ# signal used to request REFCLK that is broken, not > the REFCLK itself? > Darn... You are right. I got carried away by the initial property name. Thanks for spotting! - Mani > Johan -- மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
