On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 18:16:22 +0100 Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > When reviewing the various SPMI PMIC bindings, I noticed that several > examples were incorrect and misleading and could also use some cleanup. > > This series addresses the iio/adc ones. All look fine to me. Just waiting for the DT folk to have time to take a look. > > Johan > > > Johan Hovold (6): > dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi-iadc: fix reg description > dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi-iadc: fix example node name > dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi-iadc: clean up example > dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi-rradc: clean up example > dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi-vadc: fix example node names > dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi-vadc: clean up examples > > .../devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/qcom,spmi-iadc.yaml | 10 ++++++---- > .../devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/qcom,spmi-rradc.yaml | 4 ++-- > .../devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/qcom,spmi-vadc.yaml | 9 +++++---- > 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >
