On 29/11/2023 11:14, Jacky Huang wrote:
>
> Dear Krzysztof,
>
>
> On 2023/11/29 下午 06:02, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 29/11/2023 10:41, Jacky Huang wrote:
>>> Dear Krzysztof,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2023/11/29 下午 04:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 29/11/2023 04:35, Jacky Huang wrote:
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, it did pass the 'dtbs_check'. I guess the tool does not detect such
>>>>>>> issues.
>>>>>>> Anyway, I will fix it in the next version.
>>>>>> Hm, I see your bindings indeed allow pin-.* and unit addresses, so it is
>>>>>> the binding issue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The examples you used as reference - xlnx,zynqmp-pinctrl.yaml and
>>>>>> realtek,rtd1315e-pinctrl.yaml - do not mix these as you do.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't understand why do you need them yet. I don't see any populate of
>>>>>> children. There are no compatibles, either.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which part of your driver uses them exactly?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>>>
>>>>> I will move the 'pcfg_default: pin-default' from dtsi to dts, like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> &pinctrl {
>>>>> pcfg_default: pin-default {
>>>>> slew-rate = <0>;
>>>>> input-schmitt-disable;
>>>>> bias-disable;
>>>>> power-source = <1>;
>>>>> drive-strength = <17100>;
>>>>> };
>>>> This solves nothing. It's the same placement.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>
>>> OK, it stil be the binding issues.
>>> For "^pin-[a-z0-9]+$", I reference to the "pcfg-[a-z0-9-]+$" of
>>> rockchip,pinctrl.yaml.
>>>
>>> My intention is to describe a generic pin configuration, aiming to make
>>> the pin
>>> description more concise. In actual testing, it proves to be effective.
>> Can you instead respond to my actual questions?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
>
> The the last one item of nuvoton,pins is a phandle, which can refer to
> '&pin-default'. The following code of driver pinctrl-ma35.c parse
> "nuvoton,pins", including the node reference by phandle. list =
> of_get_property(np, "nuvoton,pins", &size); size /= sizeof(*list); if
> (!size || size % 4) { dev_err(npctl->dev, "wrong setting!\n"); return
> -EINVAL; } grp->npins = size / 4; grp->pins = devm_kzalloc(npctl->dev,
> grp->npins * sizeof(*grp->pins), GFP_KERNEL); if (!grp->pins) return
> -ENOMEM; pin = grp->settings = devm_kzalloc(npctl->dev, grp->npins *
> sizeof(*grp->settings), GFP_KERNEL); if (!grp->settings) return -ENOMEM;
> for (i = 0, j = 0; i < size; i += 4, j++) { struct device_node
> *np_config; const __be32 *phandle; pin->offset = be32_to_cpu(*list++) *
> MA35_MFP_REG_SZ_PER_BANK + MA35_MFP_REG_BASE; pin->shift =
> (be32_to_cpu(*list++) * MA35_MFP_BITS_PER_PORT) % 32; pin->muxval =
> be32_to_cpu(*list++); phandle = list++; if (!phandle) return -EINVAL;
> np_config = of_find_node_by_phandle(be32_to_cpup(phandle)); ret =
> pinconf_generic_parse_dt_config(np_config, NULL, &pin->configs,
> &pin->nconfigs); if (ret) return ret; grp->pins[j] =
> npctl->info->get_pin_num(pin->offset, pin->shift); pin++; } Best
> Regards, Jacky Huang
Sorry, I cannot parse it.
I was referring to the children with unit addresses. I don't see any
populate of the children, so why do you need them?
There are no compatibles, either.
Which part of your driver uses them exactly?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
