On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 11:03 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 1:39 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 7:12 AM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > This series adds support to set the dtc extra warning level on a per > > > arch or per platform (directory really) basis. > > > > > > The first version of this was just a simple per directory override for > > > Samsung platforms, but Conor asked to be able to do this for all of > > > riscv. > > > > > > For merging, either I can take the whole thing or the riscv and samsung > > > patches can go via their normal trees. The added variable will have no > > > effect until merged with patch 2. > > > > > > v1: > > > - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231116211739.3228239-1-robh@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > > > > There were some attempts in the past to enable W=1 in particular subsystems, > > so here is a similar comment. > > > > Adding a new warning flag to W=1 is always safe without doing any compile test. > > > > With this series, it would not be true any more because a new warning in W=1 > > would potentially break riscv/samsung platforms. > > The difference here is the people potentially adding warnings are also > the ones ensuring no warnings. > > > Linus requires a clean build (i.e. zero warning) when W= option is not given. > > Linus doesn't build any of this AFAICT. We are not always warning free > for W=0 with dtbs. Does it mean, you can enable all warnings by default? > > Rob > -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
