Hi Vinod,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, November 24, 2023 5:39 PM
> To: shravan Chippa - I35088 <Shravan.Chippa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: green.wan@xxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> paul.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxx; conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> dmaengine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Nagasuresh Relli -
> I67208 <Nagasuresh.Relli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Praveen Kumar - I30718
> <Praveen.Kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] dmaengine: sf-pdma: Support
> of_dma_controller_register()
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
>
> On 31-10-23, 10:57, shravan chippa wrote:
> > From: Shravan Chippa <shravan.chippa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Update sf-pdma driver to adopt generic DMA device tree bindings.
> > It calls of_dma_controller_register() with sf-pdma specific
> > of_dma_xlate to get the generic DMA device tree helper support and the
> > DMA clients can look up the sf-pdma controller using standard APIs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shravan Chippa <shravan.chippa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.c | 44
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.c
> > b/drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.c index d1c6956af452..4c456bdef882
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.c
> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> > #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> > #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> > #include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_dma.h>
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> >
> > #include "sf-pdma.h"
> > @@ -490,6 +491,33 @@ static void sf_pdma_setup_chans(struct sf_pdma
> *pdma)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static struct dma_chan *sf_pdma_of_xlate(struct of_phandle_args
> *dma_spec,
> > + struct of_dma *ofdma) {
> > + struct sf_pdma *pdma = ofdma->of_dma_data;
> > + struct device *dev = pdma->dma_dev.dev;
> > + struct sf_pdma_chan *chan;
> > + struct dma_chan *c;
> > + u32 channel_id;
> > +
> > + if (dma_spec->args_count != 1) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "Bad number of cells\n");
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + channel_id = dma_spec->args[0];
> > +
> > + chan = &pdma->chans[channel_id];
> > +
> > + c = dma_get_slave_channel(&chan->vchan.chan);
> > + if (!c) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "No more channels available\n");
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return c;
> > +}
>
> This seems could be replaced by of_dma_xlate_by_chan_id() can you tell me
> why that cant be used?
I will try to use the of_dma_xlate_by_chan_id() function instead of a custom function, I will try to send the next revision.
Thanks,
Shravan
>
> > +
> > static int sf_pdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> > struct sf_pdma *pdma;
> > @@ -563,7 +591,20 @@ static int sf_pdma_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > + ret = of_dma_controller_register(pdev->dev.of_node,
> > + sf_pdma_of_xlate, pdma);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> > + "Can't register SiFive Platform OF_DMA. (%d)\n", ret);
> > + goto err_unregister;
> > + }
> > +
> > return 0;
> > +
> > +err_unregister:
> > + dma_async_device_unregister(&pdma->dma_dev);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > }
> >
> > static int sf_pdma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) @@ -583,6
> > +624,9 @@ static int sf_pdma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > tasklet_kill(&ch->err_tasklet);
> > }
> >
> > + if (pdev->dev.of_node)
> > + of_dma_controller_free(pdev->dev.of_node);
> > +
> > dma_async_device_unregister(&pdma->dma_dev);
> >
> > return 0;
> > --
> > 2.34.1
>
> --
> ~Vinod
