On 27/11/2023 08:09, Macpaul Lin wrote: > On 11/25/23 18:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski and Chunfeng Yun wrote: >> >> >> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you >> have verified the sender or the content. >> >> On 25/11/2023 02:23, Chunfeng Yun wrote: >>> Due to some old SoCs with shared t-phy only support force-mode switch, and >>> can't use compatible to distinguish between shared and non-shared t-phy, >>> add a property to supported it. >>> But now prefer to use "mediatek,syscon-type" on new SoC as far as possible. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,tphy.yaml | 6 ++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,tphy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,tphy.yaml >>> index 2bb91542e984..eedba5b7025e 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,tphy.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,tphy.yaml >>> @@ -235,6 +235,12 @@ patternProperties: >>> Specify the flag to enable BC1.2 if support it >>> type: boolean >>> >>> + mediatek,force-mode: >>> + description: >>> + Use force mode to switch shared phy mode, perfer to use the bellow >> >> I still do not understand what is the "force mode" you want to use. What >> modes do you have? What are the characteristics of force mode? >> >> Also, please run spellcheck. >> >> Best regards, >> Krzysztof >> > > Thanks! > > 1. I've tested this patch and it could solve the clock unstable for > XHCI1 on mt8195 or mt8395 during system boot up or during > unload/reload the phy driver. > > The error message has been listed as follows. > > [ 13.849936][ T72] xhci-mtk 11290000.usb: supply vbus not found, > using dummy regulator > [ 13.851300][ T72] xhci-mtk 11290000.usb: uwk - reg:0x400, version:104 > [ 13.852624][ T72] xhci-mtk 11290000.usb: xHCI Host Controller > [ 13.853393][ T72] xhci-mtk 11290000.usb: new USB bus registered, > assigned bus number 3 > [ 13.874490][ T72] xhci-mtk 11290000.usb: clocks are not stable (0x3d0f) > [ 13.875369][ T72] xhci-mtk 11290000.usb: can't setup: -110 > [ 13.876091][ T72] xhci-mtk 11290000.usb: USB bus 3 deregistered > [ 13.877081][ T72] xhci-mtk: probe of 11290000.usb failed with error > -110 > > 2. This is a fix patch to XHCI1 since MT8195 has been upstream. > Please add "Fixes:" tags and "Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx" to back ward > porting to previous stable trees. > > For example, add > Fixes: 6b5ef194611e5 ("phy: mediatek: tphy: remove macros to prepare > bitfield") > is suggested since the force-mode was missing in the previous > implementation which causes hardware function was abnormal. > However, add > Fixes: 33d18746fa514 ("phy: phy-mtk-tphy: use new io helpers to access > register") > will be better since the USB support for mt8195 is already enabled in > late 2021. > > 3. How about we revise the description as follows for more precisely? > > mediatek,force-mode: > description: > The force mode is used to manually switch the shared PHY mode > between USB and PCIe. When force-mode is set, the USB 3.0 mode > will be selected. This is typically required for older SoCs > that do not automatically manage PHY mode switching. > For newer SoCs that support it, it is preferable to use the > "mediatek,syscon-type" property instead. > type: boolean Again, what is force-mode? It looks like you wrote bindings for the driver behavior. Bindings describe hardware, not how the driver should behave. The property might be reasonable, but you must describe here hardware characteristics/issue/etc. Also, your driver change suggests this is compatible specific, so why it cannot be deduced from compatible? Best regards, Krzysztof