"Luca Weiss" <luca.weiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> >> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-fairphone-fp5.dts
>> >> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-fairphone-fp5.dts
>> >> > > @@ -713,3 +713,7 @@ &venus {
>> >> > > firmware-name = "qcom/qcm6490/fairphone5/venus.mbn";
>> >> > > status = "okay";
>> >> > > };
>> >> > > +
>> >> > > +&wifi {
>> >> > > + status = "okay";
>> >> > qcom,ath11k-calibration-variant?
>> >>
>> >> What value would I put there for my device? Based on existing usages
>> >> (mostly for ath10k) I'd say "Fairphone_5"?
>> >
>> > I think this is fine.
>>
>> From style point of view I would prefer lower case and dashes, for
>> example "fairphone-5" but I'm just nitpicking, uppercase and underscores
>> work fine as well.
>
> I really don't mind, but I used "Fairphone_5" in v2 now, but I can
> change it for v3 if that happens if you wish.
Nah, no need to resend. That's fine.
But in the future please try to CC the ath11k list for patches like
this, easier to follow what's happening.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
