On 11/8/2023 5:56 PM, Conor Dooley wrote:
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 02:25:25PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
On 11/7/2023 1:34 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
Qualcomm QDU1000 DTSI comes with one LLCC0 base address as pointed by
dtbs_check:
qdu1000-idp.dtb: system-cache-controller@19200000: reg-names:2: 'llcc2_base' was expected
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Recent LLCC patches were not tested on QDU1000 thus the LLCC is there
broken. This patch at least tries to bring some sense according to
DTSI, but I have no clue what is here correct: driver, DTS or bindings.
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/qcom,llcc.yaml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/qcom,llcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/qcom,llcc.yaml
index 580f9a97ddf7..d610b0be262c 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/qcom,llcc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/qcom,llcc.yaml
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ allOf:
compatible:
contains:
enum:
+ - qcom,qdu1000-llcc
- qcom,sc7180-llcc
- qcom,sm6350-llcc
Thanks, again.
Acked-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@xxxxxxxxxxx>
I'm assuming given your employer, this ack means that there is no
llcc2_base on the qdu1000.
Yes, not even have llcc1 , just llcc0.
-Mukesh
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cheers,
Conor.
