On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 02:25:25PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote: > > > On 11/7/2023 1:34 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Qualcomm QDU1000 DTSI comes with one LLCC0 base address as pointed by > > dtbs_check: > > > > qdu1000-idp.dtb: system-cache-controller@19200000: reg-names:2: 'llcc2_base' was expected > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > Recent LLCC patches were not tested on QDU1000 thus the LLCC is there > > broken. This patch at least tries to bring some sense according to > > DTSI, but I have no clue what is here correct: driver, DTS or bindings. > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/qcom,llcc.yaml | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/qcom,llcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/qcom,llcc.yaml > > index 580f9a97ddf7..d610b0be262c 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/qcom,llcc.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/qcom,llcc.yaml > > @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ allOf: > > compatible: > > contains: > > enum: > > + - qcom,qdu1000-llcc > > - qcom,sc7180-llcc > > - qcom,sm6350-llcc > > Thanks, again. > > Acked-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@xxxxxxxxxxx> I'm assuming given your employer, this ack means that there is no llcc2_base on the qdu1000. Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cheers, Conor.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
