On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 11:26:48 -0500 Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The test tells you to expect a use-after-free... > > > ---[ end trace <<int>> ]--- ### dt-test ### pass of_unittest_lifecycle():3209 > > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free. > > Then you get a use-after-free. Looks like it is working as designed. > > I believe it's the same with kmemleak. > > Note that running DT unittests also taints the kernel. That's because > they are not meant to be run on a production system. > > Rob My bad, did not realize this is actually intended behaviour... Sorry for the noise! Regards, Erhard
