On 01/08/2015 03:40 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2015 17:37:56 Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Murali Karicheri<m-karicheri2@xxxxxx> wrote:
+ ret = of_dma_get_range(np,&dma_addr,&paddr,&size);
+ if (ret< 0) {
+ dma_addr = offset = 0;
+ size = dev->coherent_dma_mask + 1;
If coherent_dma_mask is DMA_BIT_MASK(64), then you will overflow and
have a size of 0. There may also be a problem when the mask is only
32-bit type.
The mask is always a 64-bit type, it's not optional. But you are right,
the 64-bit mask case is broken, so I guess we have to fix it differently
by always passing the smaller value into arch_setup_dma_ops and
adapting that function instead.
Arnd,
What is the smaller value you are referring to in the below code?
between *dev->dma_mask and size from DT? But overflow can still happen
when size is to be calculated in arch_setup_dma_ops() for Non DT case or
when DT size is configured to be equivalent of DMA_BIT_MASK(64) + 1. Can
we discuss the code change you have in mind when you get a chance?
Murali
Arnd
--
Murali Karicheri
Linux Kernel, Texas Instruments
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
