+Oleksij
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 01:00:53PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 12:27:29PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 10:46:20AM +0200, Ante Knezic wrote:
> > > Ok, will do. I am guessing I should leave the existing
> > > ksz8795_cpu_interface_select() as it is?
> >
> > I would encourage moving it to the simpler call path as well, but
> > ultimately this is up to you.
>
> Also, could you please put spaces in the commit prefix ("net: dsa: microchip: ")?
One more thing. You two are working on separate things on the KSZ
driver (Oleksij on
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/cover/20231019122850.1199821-1-o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/),
and this creates conflicts in the DT schema and in ksz_common.h.
For the most part, those are avoidable. Could you coordinate so that
both of your next submissions do not conflict with each other? That
means that each of your series can be applied independently of the other
(Ante's first, or Oleksij's first).
For example, the dt-schema properties do not seem alphabetically sorted
(microchip,synclko-125 comes after reset-gpios), so putting
wakeup-source after reset-gpios, and leaving microchip,rmii-clk-internal
at the end, seems a viable strategy in avoiding that conflict.
The conflict in ksz_common.h will be automatically avoided when
rmii_clk_internal stops being stored in struct ksz_device.
