On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 08:57:14AM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 12/21/2014 11:43 AM, Rickard Strandqvist wrote: > > Remove the function ti_bandgap_write_thot() that is not used anywhere. > > > > This was partially found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c | 13 ------------- > > drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.h | 1 - > > 2 files changed, 14 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c > > index 634b6ce..cbb6a5f 100644 > > --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c > > @@ -611,19 +611,6 @@ int ti_bandgap_read_thot(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id, int *thot) > > } > > > > /** > > - * ti_bandgap_write_thot() - sets sensor current thot > > - * @bgp: pointer to bandgap instance > > - * @id: sensor id > > - * @val: desired thot value > > - * > > - * Return: 0 on success or the proper error code > > - */ > > -int ti_bandgap_write_thot(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id, int val) > > -{ > > - return _ti_bandgap_write_threshold(bgp, id, val, true); > > -} > > - > > -/** > > * ti_bandgap_read_tcold() - reads sensor current tcold > > * @bgp: pointer to bandgap instance > > * @id: sensor id > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.h b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.h > > index b3adf72..976afc0 100644 > > --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.h > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.h > > @@ -371,7 +371,6 @@ struct ti_bandgap_data { > > }; > > > > int ti_bandgap_read_thot(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id, int *thot); > > -int ti_bandgap_write_thot(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id, int val); > > int ti_bandgap_read_tcold(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id, int *tcold); > > int ti_bandgap_write_tcold(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id, int val); > > int ti_bandgap_read_update_interval(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id, > > > > Not sure if removing support for programming of hot threshold is a > good idea. how about ti_bandgap_write_tcold then? Agreed here. I believe the right thing to do is to use those functions to update the thresholds when necessary. > > > -- > Regards, > Nishanth Menon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature