Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] media: dt-bindings: media: camss: Add qcom,sc8280xp-camss binding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 02:56:56PM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 10/10/2023 14:25, Rob Herring wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 13:25:38 +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> > > Add bindings for qcom,sc8280xp-camss in order to support the camera
> > > subsystem for sc8280xp as found in the Lenovo x13s Laptop.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >   .../bindings/media/qcom,sc8280xp-camss.yaml   | 582 ++++++++++++++++++
> > >   1 file changed, 582 insertions(+)
> > >   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sc8280xp-camss.yaml
> > > 
> > 
> > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> > 
> > yamllint warnings/errors:
> > 
> > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sc8280xp-camss.example.dts:26:18: fatal error: dt-bindings/clock/qcom,sc8280xp-camcc.h: No such file or directory
> >     26 |         #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,sc8280xp-camcc.h>
> >        |                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> I guess I should be embedding this
> 
> 
> This patch depends-on:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231004161853.86382-2-bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx/T/
> 
> or
> 
> 
> This patch depends-on:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231004161853.86382-2-bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#mc33be3fef01bffe892f72bd5e567dba6a047283b
> 
> below the "---" in this patch directly, instead of in the series description
> ?

I preferred in the patch itself, but now it doesn't really matter as far 
as getting a report goes. They go out now without my review. So you get 
them faster, but I can't handle dependencies unless there's a standard 
way a script can. There's 'base-commit' but I don't think that's used 
enough to rely on and it doesn't work if the dependency is not yet 
applied and in linux-next.

I'd still put the dependency here, so it's quoted in the report.

Rob




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux