On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 01:10:14PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote: > Hi Ajay, > > On 17 December 2014 at 09:31, Javier Martinez Canillas < > javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 12/16/2014 12:37 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > >> You asked Ajay to change his series to use the video port and enpoints > > DT > > >> bindings instead of phandles, could you please review his latest > > version? > > >> > > >> I guess is now too late for 3.19 since we are in the middle of the merge > > >> window but it would be great if this series can at least made it to > > 3.20. > > > > > > I don't have time to review the series in details right now, but I'm > > happy > > > with the DT bindings, and have no big issue with the rest of the > > patches. I > > > don't really like the of_drm_find_bridge() concept introduced in 03/14 > > but I > > > won't nack it given lack of time to implement an alternative proposal. > > It's an > > > internal API, it can always be reworked later anyway. > > > > Thanks a lot for taking the time to look at the DT bindings, then I guess > > that the series are finally ready to be merged? > > > > Ajay's series don't apply cleanly anymore because it has been a while since > > he posted it but he can rebase on top of 3.19-rc1 once it is released and > > re-resend. > > > > Do you have any plans to rebase this so it's ready for merging? > > Thierry, Daniel, Dave - whose tree would this be best to merge through? The plan is for me to take the bridge patches through the drm/panel tree. I'm going to look at these patches again later this week but from a very quick peek there don't seem to be any major issues left. Thierry
Attachment:
pgpcBwTXNIMNg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
