On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 02:15:12PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > The ixp4xx bindings are lacking some of the devices we have > out there in the wild, so let's add them. > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > ChangeLog v1->v2: > - Skip the crazy triplet compatible. There will have to > be one device tree including the other if this really > has to be a unique compatible for gemtek,gtwx5715. > Linksys will clearly be the most prevalent version. Ok. Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Conor. > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/intel-ixp4xx.yaml | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/intel-ixp4xx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/intel-ixp4xx.yaml > index 553dcbc70e35..d60792b1d995 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/intel-ixp4xx.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/intel-ixp4xx.yaml > @@ -16,12 +16,28 @@ properties: > oneOf: > - items: > - enum: > + - adieng,coyote > + - arcom,vulcan > + - dlink,dsm-g600-a > + - freecom,fsg-3 > + - gateway,7001 > + - gateworks,gw2348 > + - goramo,multilink-router > + - intel,ixdp425 > + - intel,ixdpg425 > + - iom,nas-100d > - linksys,nslu2 > + - netgear,wg302v1 > + - netgear,wg302v2 > + - usr,8200 > - welltech,epbx100 > + - linksys,wrv54g > + - gemtek,gtwx5715 > - const: intel,ixp42x > - items: > - enum: > - gateworks,gw2358 > + - intel,kixrp435 > - const: intel,ixp43x > > additionalProperties: true > > -- > 2.41.0 >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
